Performance Analysis of AODV, OLSR and GRP Routing Protocols in MANET

Authors

  • Naveen Bilandi
  • Harsh K. Verma

Abstract

Abstract
This paper aims to compare performance of three routing protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc networks (MANET’s). A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile nodes forming a temporary network without using any centralized access point, infrastructure, or centralized administration. In present study, a comparison of reactive routing protocol i.e., Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV), proactive routing protocol i.e., Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and hybrid routing protocol i.e., gathering-based routing protocol (GRP) has been made on the basis of throughput, delay and network load with increasing in number of nodes in the network. Authors have used OPNET Simulator from Scalable Networks to perform the simulations. Three routing protocols are being analysed on the above mentioned parameters and it can be concluded that OLSR performs remarkably better than AODV and GRP on prevailing node increasing in the network.


Keywords: MANET, AODV, OLSR,GRP, OPNET, routing protocols

Downloads

Published

2019-07-09

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013)

Section

Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.