A Survey of Queuing and Scheduling Mechanism of Input-queued Switches
Abstract
ABSTRACT
High-speed routers play an important role in the Internet. A main hindrance to high-speed router design is its switch architecture. It concerns with how packets are moved from switch input ports to output ports. The switch architecture can be classified as Output-Queued and Input-Queued switches. It is well known that Output-Queued switches can achieve optimal delay-throughput performance. Output-queued switches are generally impractical for high-speed implementation because of high speed needed for both switch fabric and output port buffers. Input-queued switch architecture becomes the alternative since it needs no (or little) speedup. Input queuing is becoming increasingly used for high bandwidth switches and routers. In an input-queued switch, each input port can send at most one packet and each output port can at most receive one packet in each time slot. In VOQ each input port maintains a separate queue for each output port. It has been shown that VOQ can achieve 100% throughput performance with an effective scheduling algorithm. It addresses a common problem known as Head-Of-Line (HOL) blocking. The scheduling problem is equivalent to the matching problem in a bipartite graph.
Keywords: Scheduling, Queuing, Matching, Bipartite, Switch-fabric
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |