Open Access
Subscription Access
Advancement of Lifelong Learning Through Online Communities
Abstract
The concept of long-lasting learning has risen with the development of web and e-learning. In today's competitive environment, learning is not restricted to a conventional four-year degree but is a progressing handle that endures all through the lifetime of a person. The Web offers curiously conceivable outcomes for dispersing instructive fabric to understudies, both locally and as portion of farther education. One of the vital parts of higher instruction in cultivating lifelong learning is to assist understudies accomplish teaching or proficient information. This study looks at the idea of how a wide learning network, empowered by Web 2.0 innovations, can be utilized to make learning administration frameworks (LMS) that would make long lasting learning successful. The emerging knowledge society places modern prerequisites on the instruction division to bolster the requirements of people and organizations. Within the region of long-lasting learning, which is one of the foremost imperative engines driving instruction within the 21st century, e-learning has ended up a collaborative and community-based handle. This calls for devices to back the independent and energetic creation of deep-rooted learning communities and unused disseminated e-learning administrations. To this conclusion, the integration of inventive models, strategies and innovations for the creation, capacity, and trade of information assets and user-generated substance, learning exercises and units of learning, competence improvement programs and systems for deep rooted learning is being explored worldwide. Progressed advances that utilize decentralized arrangements where both assets and computation can be conveyed have been created within the shape of online communities made by online collaborative apparatuses, blogs, wikis, webcasts, webinars and social organizing applications. These applications encourage the improvement of a specialized, organizational infrastructure for deep rooted learning in formal or casual learning settings.
Keywords
References
Alexander B. Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. 2006; 41(2): 33–34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44. Retrieved 20 February from http://www.middlebury.edu/nr/rdonlyres/2c9efffc-00b4-46e9-9ce532d63a0fe9b5/0/unbound_02_
_web2.pdf
Downes S. (2006). E-learning 2.0. [Online]. eLearn Magazine. Retrieved 20 February from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1Pg 1
Berlanga Adriana J, PBS, Francis Browns, Peter van Rosmalen, Bitter-Rijpkema Marlies E, Rob Koeper. Functionality for Learning Networks: Lessons Learned from Social Web Applications. Paper presented at the ePortfolio, Maastricht. 2007 Oct 17–19.
Biggs J. Constructing learning by aligning teaching: Constructive alignment. Teaching for quality learning at university. Teaching for quality learning at university Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press; 2003. pp. 11–33.
Biggs J, editor. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press: Buckingham.
Coates H, James R, Baldwin G. A Critical Examination of the Effects of Learning Management Systems on University Teaching and Learning. Tert Educ Manag. 2005; 11(1): 19–36.
Cqu.edu.au. (2023). CQU Handbook. CG04 -Bachelor of Professional Communication. [Online] Available at: https://handbook.cqu.edu.au/he/courses/structure/CG04/2182/
Dalsgaard C. Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning (EURODL). 2006. 12; 9(2). [Online] Available at: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm.
Edwards R, Raggatt P, Harrison R, McCollum A, Calder J. Recent thinking in lifelong learning. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) Research Report. Nov 1998(80).
Summerville J, Fischetti J. The loophole generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education (IJOE). 2007 Dec; 4(2): 6.
Indiana University. (2002). 2002 Pychometric Framework. [Online]. Retrieved 20 February from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/psychometric_framework_2002.cfm
Ladyshewsky RK. (2004). Online learning versus face to face learning: What is the difference? Teaching and Learning Forum 2004. [Online]. Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved 20 February from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2004/ladyshewsky.html
Lave JEW. Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. [Online]. Retrieved 20 February from http://www3.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521413084
Moore M. Three types of interaction. Am J Distance Educ. 1989; 3(2): 1–7. Retrieved 20 February from http://www.ajde.com/Contents/vol3_2.htm#editorial
Mossberg W. (2007). The Most Poisonous Force in Technology « CIOh-no. The most poisonous force in technology. [Online]. Retrieved 20 February from http://pmasson.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/the-most-poisonous-force-in-technology/
Sigal M. (2005 Aug 9). Envisioning RSS as a Web 2.0 platform. [Online]. Retrieved 19 February from http://blogs.oreilly.com/digitalmedia/2005/08/envisioning-rss-as-a-web-20-pl.html
Siemens G. (2006). Learning or Management System? [Online]. Retrieved 19 February from http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/learning-or-managementsystem-with-reference-list.doc
Wingate U. A Framework for Transition: Supporting ‘Learning to Learn’ in Higher Education. High Educ Q. 2007 July 2; 61(3): 391–405.
Aggarwal D, Sharma D. Technical Graduates in India: Why Self Development and Employability are needed? Int J Sci Technol Res. 2020 Mar; 9(03): 5563–5570.
Kharb L, Singh P. Role of machine learning in modern education and teaching. Impact of AI Technologies on Teaching, Learning, and Research in Higher Education. 2021; pp. 99–123). IGI Global.
Aggarwal D, Sharma D. Stakeholders’ Perspective towards the Contingency Education Model during Covid 19 Pandemic. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2021; 13(1): 150–154.
Rhode J. (2007 Nov 18). E-learning interaction matrix. [Online]. Retrieved February 2016.
Dron J, Anderson T. Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2007 Oct 15; 2460–2467. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Astin A. Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass: Wiley; 1985. [Online]. Retrieved 20 February from http://www.middlesex.mass.edu/TutoringServices/AstinInvolvement.pdf
Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.
Siemens G. (2004 Nov 21). Learning Management Systems: The wrong place to start learning. [Online]. retrieved 20 February from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/lms.htm.
Johnson M, Liber O. The Personal Learning Environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice. Interact Learn Environ. 2008; 16(1): 3–15.
Lubensky R. The present and future of personal learning environments. Blogpost, last retrieved from: http://www.deliberations.com.au/2006/12/present-and-future-of-personal-learning.html. 2006.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Current Trends in Information Technology
- eISSN: 2249-4707
- ISSN: 2348-7895