Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Information and Communication Technology for Dyslexic Students in Higher Education: A Comparative Review Study

Trailokya Raj Ojha


This research work is a comparative study that investigates how information communication technology (ICT) affects dyslexic students' academic performance in higher education. The study looks at the efficacy of several ICT tools, such as text-to-speech software, mind-mapping software, and spelling and grammar checkers, in enhancing dyslexic pupils' organizing, reading, and writing skills. The study found that the use of ICT tools and receiving individualized coaching can greatly increase dyslexic students' academic success in higher education. Pupils who received individualized guidance and had access to the essential ICT tools performed better academically overall and received higher grades than those who did not. Additionally, the study contrasts the experiences of dyslexic pupils who get individualized and adaptable support with those of those who do not. The results show that using ICT tools and receiving specialized coaching can considerably increase dyslexic students' academic success in higher education. The study underscores the need for more research in this area and offers insightful information on how ICT may be used to benefit dyslexic pupils.


Dyslexia, higher education, learning disability, ICT, ICT in education, assistive technology

Full Text:



International Dyslexia Association. [Online]. [Accessed on: May 9, 2023].

Rello L. Design of word exercises for children with dyslexia. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014; 27: 74–83.

Baeza-Yates R, Rello L. Estimating dyslexia in the Web. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. 2011 Mar; 1–4. 1969289.1969300.

Tops W, Callens M, Bijn E, Brysbaert M. Spelling in Adolescents with Dyslexia: Errors and Modes of Assessment. J Learn Disabil. 2014; 47(4): 295–306. https:// 0022219412468159.

Ugwu CJ. Special education. Study of differences. Rivers State Nigeria: TND press Ltd.; 2015.

Lyons GR, Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz SE. Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teachers’ knowledge of language and reading. Ann Dyslexia. 2003; 53: 1–14.

Thompson LS. Dyslexia: An investigation of teacher awareness in mainstream high schools. Doctoral dissertation. South Africa: University of South Africa; 2013.

Greenberg D, Ehri LC, Perin D. Do adult literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Sci Stud Read. 2002; 6(3): 221–243.

Miller-Shaul S. The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. Dyslexia. 2005; 11(2): 132–151.

Sabatini J. Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons. Sci Stud Read. 2002; 6(3): 267–298.

Callens M, Tops W, Brysbaert M. Cognitive profile of students who enter higher education with an indication of dyslexia. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(6): e38081. pone.0038081.

Deacon SH, Cook K, Parrila R. Identifying high-functioning dyslexics: Is self-report of early reading problems enough? Ann Dyslexia. 2012; 62(2): 120–134. s11881-012-0068-2.

Pino M, Mortari L. The inclusion of students with dyslexia in higher education: A systematic review using narrative synthesis. Dyslexia. 2014; 20(4): 346–369.

Richardson JTE, Wydell TN. The representation and attainment of students with dyslexia in UK higher education. Read Writ. 2003; 16(5): 475–503.

Kazakou M, Soulis S, Morfidi E, Mikropoulos TA. Phonological awareness software for dyslexic children. Themes Sci Technol Educ. 2011; 4(1): 33–51.

Rahman FA, Mokhtar F, Alias NA, Saleh R. Multimedia elements as instructions for dyslexic children. Int J Educ Inf Technol. 2012; 6(2): 193–200.

Skiada R, Soroniati E, Gardeli A, Zissis D. EasyLexia: a mobile application for children with learning difficulties. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014; 27: 218–228. j.procs.2014.02.025.

Ismaili J, Ibrahimi EHO. Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students. Educ Inf Technol. 2016; 22(3): 1–17.

Rose FD, Brooks BM, Attree EA. An exploratory investigation into the usability and usefulness of training people with learning disabilities in a virtual environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24(11–12): 627–633.

Kalyvioti K, Mikropoulos TA. Virtual environments and dyslexia: a literature review. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014; 27: 138–147.

Brown K, Broido EM. Engaging students with disabilities. In: Quaye SJ, Harper SR, editors. Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for a Diverse Population. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015; 186–207.

Lambert DC, Dryer R. Quality of life of higher education students with learning disabilities studying online. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2018; 65(4): 393–407. 1034912X.2017.1410876.

Bowers JS. The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychol Rev. 2016; 123(5): 600–612.

Griful-Freixenet J, Struyven K, Vantieghem W, Gheyssens E. Exploring the interrelationship between universal design for learning (UDL) and differentiated instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educ Res Rev. 2020; 29: 100306.

McGregor KK, Langenfeld N, Van Horne S, Oleson J, Anson M, Jacobson W. The university experiences of students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2016; 31(2): 90–102.

McMorris CA, Baraskewich J, Ames MA, Shaikh KT, Ncube BL, Bebko, JM. Mental health issues in post-secondary students with autism spectrum disorder: Experiences in accessing services. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2019; 17(3): 585–595.

Gall M, Breeze N. Music and eJay: An opportunity for creative collaborations in the classroom. Int J Educ Res. 2008; 47(1): 27–40.

Bjekić D, Obradović S, Vučetić M, Bojović M. E-teacher in inclusive e-education for students with specific learning disabilities. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 128: 128–133.

Sidhu MS, Manzura E. A multisensory multimedia model to support dyslexic children in learning. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications (SIGMAP). 2010 Jul; 193–202.

Nusir S, Alsmadi I, Al-Kabi M, Shardqah F. Designing an interactive multimedia learning system for the children of primary schools in Jordan. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). 2011 Apr; 45–51.

Taylor M, Duffy S, Hughes G. The use of animation in higher education teaching to support students with dyslexia. Education+ Training. 2007; 49(1): 25–35.

Denton CA, Montroy JJ, Zucker TA, Cannon G. Designing an intervention in reading and self-regulation for students with significant reading difficulties, including dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2021 Aug;44(3):170–82.

Kurzweil Education; 2023. Available from: (accessed:%20november%2029,%202022)

Sprint. [Online]. (Accessed: November 29, 2022)

Diraä N, Engelen J, Ghesquière P, Neyens K. The use of ICT to support students with dyslexia. In HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion: 5th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2009, Linz, Austria. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009 Nov 9–10; 5: 457–462.

Benmarrakchi F, El Kafi J, Elhore A, Haie S. Exploring the use of the ICT in supporting dyslexic students’ preferred learning styles: A preliminary evaluation. Educ Inf Technol. 2017; 22(6): 2939–2957.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Current Trends in Information Technology

  • eISSN: 2249-4707
  • ISSN: 2348-7895